Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	95.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 (all builds)
Memory	57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '18 at 17:47
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	47%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 87% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 88.4 1-Core 85.1 2-Core 185 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 365 8-Core 819 68% 592 Pts	64-Core 1,531 95% 1,531 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3360) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.6% Outstanding	Lighting 113 Reflection 156 Parallax 151 92% 140 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 141 Splatting 116 102% 126 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50 9,565 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 580GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1007C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2531 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1275 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 132 (A3) Unknown 100 100 67 (A4) Unknown 100 100 56230 (A5) Unknown 100 100 253 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 27 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 23 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 52404 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 3 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 395154 (F2) Unknown 100 100 506074 (F5) Unknown 100 100 899680	88.9% Excellent	Read 507 Write 425 Mixed 394 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 81.7 4K Mixed 27.5 116% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 65.7 78% 137 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 105%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 477GB free Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	279% Outstanding	Read 2,153 Write 1,455 Mixed 1,542 380% 1,717 MB/s	4K Read 46.3 4K Write 212 4K Mixed 58.7 257% 105 MB/s	DQ Read 783 DQ Write 389 DQ Mixed 213 257% 462 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 279% Great: 283%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 747GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 155 152 7216 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10656 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 35 35 47514 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2402 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 75 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10647 (C2) HDA temperature 123 102 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41.2% Average	Read 74.6 Write 68.9 Mixed 70.4 54% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.37 91% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x16GB 1,040 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	MC Read 42.3 MC Write 37.1 MC Mixed 32.6 107% 37.3 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 16.9 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $290

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	297x
Core i7-6950XIntel $499Bench 87%, 6,135 samples	246x
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	129x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	180x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	175x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	62x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	47x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 3,140 samples	18x
Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 95%, 3,531 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $1,571

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16