| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P35C-DS3R (all builds) |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20081117 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 15 '18 at 17:03 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | DNK-User |
| Background CPU | 28% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650-$850
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
50%
Average
|
45% 68.6 Pts
|
18% 140 Pts
|
9% 152 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 250E
Sapphire(174B E213) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.5.2
|
8.96%
Terrible
|
8% 12.4 fps
|
10% 12.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
36.7%
Below average
|
35% 158 MB/s
|
61% 19.7 MB/s
|
16% 28.5 MB/s
|
|
|
57.4%
Above average
|
67% 90.4 MB/s
|
93% 0.98 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
21.9%
Poor
|
20% 6.93 GB/s
|
17% 5.93 GB/s
|
46% 86.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-P35C-DS3R Builds (Compare 62 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P35C-DS3R
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 9x |
| Core2 Duo E6750IntelBench 38%, 9,456 samples | 8x |
| Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 5x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $211 |