Lenovo 10MQS10Q0E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10MQS10Q0E  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3111
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '18 at 07:24
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 151
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 238
33% 243 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 3111) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4574
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.7% Terrible
Lighting 3.57
Reflection 5.23
Parallax 3.38
3% 4.06 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 3.03
Splatting 9.26
5% 6.02 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.7%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000L1 128GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 1,174
Write 613
Mixed 691
182% 826 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 35
142% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 99.5
DQ Mixed 27.7
45% 88.5 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 133%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 10.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 11.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback