| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 8.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | HP 500-203a (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2AF7 |
| Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20140205 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 15 '18 at 01:36 |
| Run Duration | 85 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-4770
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
83.8%
Excellent
|
81% 144 Pts
|
65% 512 Pts
|
36% 585 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90D3) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1
|
8.01%
Terrible
|
8% 11.5 fps
|
7% 9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP36 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
90.1%
Outstanding
|
116% 154 MB/s
|
102% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
31.7%
Below average
|
28% 9.87 GB/s
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
57% 70.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 500-203a Builds (Compare 5 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 500-203a
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 2x |
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 1x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $113 |