Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	17.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121019
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '18 at 22:02
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9370-$194 9,054 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 79 1-Core 56.2 2-Core 109 52% 81.5 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 316 32% 259 Pts	64-Core 311 19% 311 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% EVGA(3842 2678) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	28.8% Poor	Lighting 33.6 Reflection 33.9 Parallax 41.8 27% 36.4 fps	MRender 47.3 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 33 31% 39.2 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 19855995 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 61916248552665 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2191 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 582 (B1) Unknown 0 0 96 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 41 49 68722688041 (C2) HDA temperature 41 49 68722688041 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 19855995 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 19855995 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 19855995 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 24458 (EA) Unknown 0 0 13269 (F1) Unknown 0 0 13269 (F2) Unknown 0 0 10859	32.9% Below average	Read 176 Write 112 Mixed 140 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 10.1 59% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 21.6 DQ Write 59.2 DQ Mixed 9.42 16% 30.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128 11,448 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 422GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 191 174 3408 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 528 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6793 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 461 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 248 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 279 (C2) HDA temperature 106 95 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	67.2% Good	Read 124 Write 110 Mixed 67.1 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1.03 4K Write 2.22 4K Mixed 0.42 131% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 74%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 169GB free Firmware: JPFOA3FF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 124 124 139 (03) Spinup time 123 123 12896567491 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1758 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 48257 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 498 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1814 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1814 (C2) HDA temperature 144 144 214749413414 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 91	39.9% Below average	Read 64.7 Write 74.1 Mixed 38 44% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.41 84% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 24GB 14,716 User benchmarks, average bench 43% null MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 11.1 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 9.1 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 82.4 48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 Builds (Compare 1,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 - $100

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	268x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	184x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	134x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	64x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	63x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	49x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	23x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	199x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	186x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	175x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $175

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16