User System

Performance Results

Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 28%
Workstation 17%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardPOSITIVO MB40II5
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 20:04
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3-2310M-$170
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
25.3% Poor
SC Int 46.5
SC Float 39.6
SC Mixed 34.3
32% 40.1 Pts
QC Int 120
QC Float 130
QC Mixed 134
29% 128 Pts
MC Int 129
MC Float 136
MC Mixed 118
19% 128 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 31%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 9981) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 4.4
2% 6.13 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 8.7
2% 6.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 240GB
182GB free
Firmware: Q0526A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 469
Write 424
Mixed 448
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 25.2
99% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 38.2
49% 88.7 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 110%
Seagate ST9100824AS 100GB-$172
89GB free
Firmware: 3.14 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 34.8
Write 35.3
Mixed 35.5
26% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.28
68% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown AD73I1B1674EU 04CB 6GB
1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.4% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 10
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $175Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $123
Intel Core i5-8600K $239AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $116
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $177SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $911SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback