| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus P7P55-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110425 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 14 '18 at 17:36 |
| Run Duration | 90 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.9%
Very good
|
68% 113 Pts
|
49% 364 Pts
|
23% 365 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.11
|
57.5%
Above average
|
58% 67.2 fps
|
57% 69.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
51.7%
Above average
|
61% 81.4 MB/s
|
59% 0.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 16GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
38.7%
Below average
|
36% 12.5 GB/s
|
34% 11.8 GB/s
|
64% 62.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P7P55-M Builds (Compare 255 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P7P55-M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 65x |
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 52x |
| Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 39x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples | 15x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $100 |