User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardPositivo POS-PQ45AU
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100302
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 13:36
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium E5400-$52
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
23.9% Poor
SC Int 64.2
SC Float 38.9
SC Mixed 49.3
41% 50.8 Pts
QC Int 130
QC Float 76.1
QC Mixed 98.1
23% 102 Pts
MC Int 131
MC Float 77.6
MC Mixed 97.2
16% 102 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 25%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
EVGA(3842 1235) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 4.7
2% 8.2 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 5.9
3% 7.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$16
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JF100-22 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 48.5
Write 56.8
Mixed 38.8
36% 48 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $73
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback