User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.14% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAdvent Centurion CPQ9104
MotherboardFOXCONN A7VMX-K
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 12:59
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Phenom 9650-$125
Socket 940, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
31% Below average
SC Int 54.1
SC Float 34
SC Mixed 42.3
35% 43.5 Pts
QC Int 204
QC Float 133
QC Mixed 162
38% 166 Pts
MC Int 210
MC Float 136
MC Mixed 162
26% 169 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E198) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.12.0.0
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
6.14% Terrible
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 17.7
6% 18.7 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 15.8
6% 14.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.14%
Great: 8%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$30
378GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 98.8
Write 75.9
Mixed 58.8
58% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.37
102% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 6.1
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 45%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $175Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $138
Intel Core i5-8600K $235AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $177SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $911SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback