Asus GL702ZC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemAsus GL702ZC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702ZC
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20171215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 12:14
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$204
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
79.6% Very good
SC Int 89.9
SC Float 92.1
SC Mixed 93.3
73% 91.8 Pts
QC Int 327
QC Float 365
QC Mixed 369
80% 354 Pts
MC Int 1,054
MC Float 1,086
MC Mixed 1,083
161% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$270
Asus(1043 1A60) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1077 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.7% Average
Lighting 114
Reflection 141
Parallax 177
42% 144 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 120
Splatting 109
48% 114 fps
Poor: 61%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 75%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$103
130GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,414
Write 1,033
Mixed 1,246
343% 1,564 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 44.7
212% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 167
186% 319 MB/s
Poor: 171%
This bench: 241%
Great: 264%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$60
660GB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 75.3
Mixed 22.9
48% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 0.72
4K Mixed 0.42
97% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 27.6
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 26.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 83%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GL702ZC Builds (Compare 219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

System: Asus GL702ZC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $204
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $160Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $125
Intel Core i5-8600K $222AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $177SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback