User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.78% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardHUAWEI HUAWEI MateBook D
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170929
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 11:49
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
51.2% Above average
SC Int 79.9
SC Float 88.3
SC Mixed 90.8
69% 86.3 Pts
QC Int 197
QC Float 212
QC Mixed 232
48% 214 Pts
MC Int 227
MC Float 258
MC Mixed 241
36% 242 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Device(19E5 3E03) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4815
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.78% Terrible
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 21.5
7% 22.5 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 32.5
9% 21.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.78%
Great: 9%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNK256GVN8 256GB
182GB free
Firmware: K8XA4104 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 479
Write 236
Mixed 311
75% 342 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 26.3
105% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 52.2
89% 177 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 10.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $160Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $125
Intel Core i5-8600K $222AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $177SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $911SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback