Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 11:19
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 187
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 315
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L5 LITE SSD 480GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0120B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 499
Write 396
Mixed 10.9
66% 302 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 5.89
80% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 4.68
DQ Mixed 5.98
18% 43.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 97%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
470GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 86.4
Mixed 89.6
67% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.17
60% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FHP 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.9% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 14
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,030 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $322
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback