Asus X205TA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
19 days ago, 7 days ago.
SystemAsus X205TA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X205TA
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 11:07
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Atom Z3735F
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
15% Very poor
SC Int 30.2
SC Float 17.3
SC Mixed 21.7
18% 23.1 Pts
QC Int 105
QC Float 60
QC Mixed 76.4
18% 80.4 Pts
MC Int 104
MC Float 60.5
MC Mixed 75.6
12% 80 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15%
Great: 15%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Asus(1043 18CD) 1,024MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3958
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 2.5
1% 2.37 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.2
1% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hynix HBG4e 31GB
4GB free
Firmware: 0.4
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 64%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 27%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X205TA Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X205TA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $138
Intel Core i5-8600K $235AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $177SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $911SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback