Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2.25GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.25GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq dc5100 SFF(PM215AV) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 09E8h
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2.25049 GB @ 0.5 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20050825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '18 at 08:50
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 2.80GHz-$100 1,546 User benchmarks, average bench 28% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.73% Terrible	Memory 15.5 1-Core 4.1 2-Core 12.9 8% 10.8 Pts	4-Core 13.8 8-Core 5 2% 9.4 Pts	64-Core 8.8 0% 8.8 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 8.73% Great: 38%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST340014A 34GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.06 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 66 46 236455860 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 243 (05) Reallocated sector count 89 89 443 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 594702971 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12487 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 81 81 19897 (C2) HDA temperature 43 58 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 66 46 236455860 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 97 211 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 97 211 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 189 20 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 251 2	19% Very poor	Read 35.6 Write 30.6 Mixed 18.6 21% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 0.38 4K Mixed 0.24 48% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 34GB 830 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 512, 256, 512, 33280 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	5.34% Terrible	MC Read 2.2 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 1.7 5% 1.9 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 0.8 SC Mixed 0.5 1% 0.47 GB/s	Latency 356 11% 356 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.34% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16