Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '18 at 07:22
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 89.6 1-Core 74.6 2-Core 154 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 475 48% 390 Pts	64-Core 468 29% 468 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Lighting 36.5 Reflection 26.8 Parallax 36.9 30% 33.4 fps	MRender 39.2 Gravity 35.1 Splatting 34.9 30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Sol id State Disk 240GB 298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10512 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 824 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 81 81 279 (AD) Unknown 100 100 6553750 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 380 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 90 (F1) Unknown 100 100 14452	43.3% Average	Read 230 Write 152 Mixed 241 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 22.6 4K Mixed 9.81 67% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 8.46 39% 87.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB 17,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 368GB free Firmware: JP2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 96 77 458753 (02) Throughput performance 126 100 132 (03) Spinup time 117 100 12897681605 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 9677 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 65570 (07) Seek error rate 100 90 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 100 31 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 36279 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 7169 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 2 2 6488063 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 1572864 (BC) Unknown 100 93 62204392 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 47 471924766 (C0) Power-off retract count 92 92 9713 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 9713 (C2) HDA temperature 200 120 227634249758 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 5 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	81.5% Excellent	Read 141 Write 143 Mixed 123 102% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.02 4K Mixed 0.35 120% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 368GB free Firmware: CR10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 9 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2816 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3826 (05) Reallocated sector count 90 90 95 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 67591 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2214 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 644258962 (BB) vendor-specific 47 47 196662 (BC) Unknown 100 100 47 (BE) vendor-specific 72 50 28 (C2) HDA temperature 154 88 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 644258962 (C4) Reallocation count 90 90 95 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 8	79.7% Very good	Read 134 Write 144 Mixed 134 103% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.07 4K Mixed 0.56 144% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 44%
WD WD3201ABYS-01B9A0 320GB 396 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 148GB free Firmware: 13.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 160 156 4975 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1777 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13510 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 908 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1160 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2704 (C2) HDA temperature 116 101 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	36.8% Below average	Read 64 Write 63.6 Mixed 63.5 48% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2.23 4K Mixed 0.35 109% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 2048, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	48.3% Average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 16.6 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 12.5 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	531x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	263x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	255x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	157x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	94x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	82x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	40x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	447x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	259x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	222x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $134

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16