Asus M4A78LT-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M4A78LT-M (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100824
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '18 at 03:51
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 84.3 1-Core 52.8 2-Core 104 52% 80.4 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 274 29% 231 Pts	64-Core 279 17% 279 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440 14,286 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 83B0) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	3.98% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 5.81 Parallax 4 4% 4.9 fps	MRender 6.67 Gravity 4.97 Splatting 3.52 4% 5.05 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.98% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 134 134 34387853738 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 77 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 94 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 77 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 77 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 141735165981 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	100% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 166 Mixed 161 128% 170 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.19 89% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 66 (03) Spinup time 126 126 25789464876 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 984 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1146 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 94 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 985 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 985 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 201864445985 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	107% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 187 Mixed 176 137% 182 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.18 90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 375GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 91409440 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2463 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 310706736 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 10377 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2382 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BC) Unknown 100 99 115965886928 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 371 (BE) vendor-specific 67 42 279744544801 (C2) HDA temperature 33 58 42949672993 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 40 28 91409440 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -129480379055837 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3846130351 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3354987912	62.8% Good	Read 116 Write 103 Mixed 101 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.55 117% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.4% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 11.5 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 8.5 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A78LT-M Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A78LT-M

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	9x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	9x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	8x
HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples	6x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	17x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	9x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $203

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16