Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics86.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DRG-Q
Memory124.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '18 at 19:10
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel 0000
CPU1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 54.3
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 167
56% 101 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 603
54% 457 Pts
64-Core 2,779
172% 2,779 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64LC (Liquid Cooled)-$1,700
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1752 MHz, MLim: 995 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.2
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.7% Excellent
Lighting 96.6
Reflection 97.1
Parallax 195
79% 129 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 127
Splatting 141
102% 122 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 514
Write 495
Mixed 490
112% 500 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 18.8
71% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 20.4
DQ Write 35.5
DQ Mixed 12.7
14% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 116%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 126
Write 128
Mixed 127
96% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.22
106% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 99%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$64
693GB free
Firmware: 01.01K02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 155
Write 113
Mixed 125
98% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.75
4K Mixed 0.61
141% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB1-CRC M393A2K40BB1-CRC M393A2K40BB1-CRC M393A2K40BB1-CRC M393A2G40EB1-CPB M393A2G40EB1-CPB M393A2G40EB1-CPB M393A2G40EB1-CPB 128GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 70
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 33.3
126% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 146
28% 146 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 107%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $627
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback