HP RP9 G1 AiO Retail System, Model 9018

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.73% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemHP RP9 G1 AiO Retail System, Model 9018  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8139
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150923
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 13 '18 at 19:04
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-6500-$165
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79.6% Very good
SC Int 108
SC Float 116
SC Mixed 111
89% 112 Pts
QC Int 402
QC Float 428
QC Mixed 413
94% 415 Pts
MC Int 401
MC Float 428
MC Mixed 396
61% 409 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8139) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4574
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
7.73% Terrible
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 21.3
6% 22.9 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 32.5
9% 21.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.73%
Great: 10%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPV128HDGM-000H1 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW24H0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A5143DB0-CPB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 41%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical RP9 G1 AiO Retail System, Model 9018 Builds (Compare 0 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP RP9 G1 AiO Retail System, Model 9018

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $245AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback