Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '18 at 18:00
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 143
60% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 429
42% 344 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 2981) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.6% Above average
Lighting 75.8
Reflection 79.7
Parallax 76.5
62% 77.3 fps
MRender 76.9
Gravity 69.7
Splatting 60.1
55% 68.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$85
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 415
Write 306
Mixed 281
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 17.4
87% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 72.6
DQ Mixed 36.9
44% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 121%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
346GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 106
Write 72.5
Mixed 78.6
64% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.25
79% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 69%
PI-239 USB 2.0 Drive 320GB
47GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 33.1
Mixed 8.63
30% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.15
16% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML16GX3M2A1600C10 F3-17000CL11-4GBXL CML16GX3M2A1600C10 F3-17000CL11-4GBXL 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback