Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	8.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150219
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '18 at 12:20
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 173 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 344 46% 341 Pts	64-Core 336 21% 336 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 410 934 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 094A) 512MB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 388.16 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	2.88% Terrible	Lighting 3.47 Reflection 3.23 Parallax 3.75 3% 3.48 fps	MRender 3.86 Gravity 4.07 Splatting 3.22 3% 3.71 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.88% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 2.5 7MM 128GB 1,555 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4130012 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4174 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 87 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 2 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 5109 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 72 61 261994315804 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 253404905531 (EE) Unknown 100 100 16677104 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1490197223 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1443630959	53.2% Above average	Read 487 Write 175 Mixed 291 70% 318 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 29.8 4K Mixed 18.4 61% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 41.1 DQ Mixed 10.1 28% 63.9 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 90%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB 3,351 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 13GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	8.57% Terrible	Read 29.1 Write 12.2 Mixed 20.4 24% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.41 4K Write 0.28 4K Mixed 0.69 46% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.57% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 10GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.2% Below average	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 8.7 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 9.3 28% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	275x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	238x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16