Medion Erazer X5355 F/B745

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Medion Erazer X5355 F/B745 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION Z170H4-EA
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '16 at 22:46
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Memory 89.8 1-Core 117 2-Core 234 83% 147 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 641 66% 530 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	59.8% Above average	Lighting 75.8 Reflection 79.2 Parallax 69.8 62% 74.9 fps	MRender 77.2 Gravity 67.3 Splatting 62.7 56% 69.1 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-00000 256GB 1,578 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1038 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 216 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 10 (AE) Unknown 99 99 14 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 758 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 60 37 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 16693328 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1139 (F2) Unknown 99 99 1002 (F9) Unknown 99 99 2560	97.8% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 295 Mixed 348 85% 383 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 35.8 151% 57.2 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 111 138% 245 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 192042112 (03) Spinup time 98 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 392 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 68 60 6661766 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1035 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 215 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 66 555483167 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 10763 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 17179869215 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -107326937759017 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3344542441 (F2) Unknown 100 253 631171156741	101% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 157 Mixed 149 126% 167 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.2 69% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 114%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB 505 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 134GB free, PID 01f0 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 70.2 Write 75 Mixed 69.3 93% 71.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.15 67% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 68%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 6GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 58.5 Write 85.3 Mixed 63.8 93% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.19 70% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$299 20,912 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 26.4 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 34 SC Mixed 25.9 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer X5355 F/B745 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 91%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

System: Medion Erazer X5355 F/B745

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBHyperX $299Bench 79%, 20,912 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $1,016

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16