Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170921
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '18 at 08:59
Run Duration	522 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Memory 91.6 1-Core 136 2-Core 266 92% 164 Pts	4-Core 532 8-Core 761 81% 647 Pts	64-Core 768 48% 768 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB; zotac 1050 ti mini CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.4% Below average	Lighting 38 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 35.8 31% 34.7 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 35.9 Splatting 34.4 29% 36 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP S700 250GB-$46 9,815 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0616B1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 782 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 359 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 53 (AE) Unknown 100 100 37 (B0) Unknown 100 100 100 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 46 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 212956 (F2) Unknown 100 100 143635 (F3) Unknown 100 100 359287	60.7% Good	Read 481 Write 305 Mixed 335 83% 374 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 73.8 4K Mixed 3.35 77% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 17.2 DQ Write 62.7 DQ Mixed 3.18 13% 27.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 98%
Toshiba DT01ABA200V 2TB 2,433 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 1TB free Firmware: MZ4OACA0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 133 133 17197236484 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 615 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 955 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 352 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3235 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3235 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 184685101092 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	84.2% Excellent	Read 146 Write 147 Mixed 142 109% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.16 85% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 87%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 1TB 4,641 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 120GB free Firmware: 0108 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	Read 32.8 Write 38.3 Mixed 30.6 25% 33.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 3.45 4K Mixed 0.29 129% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 63%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 277GB free, PID 25e1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 59.1 Write 64.2 Mixed 47.8 73% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.22 64% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 61%
Multiple Flash Reader 32GB 187 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 28GB free, PID 6361 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 1.08 Write 5.7 Mixed 14.1 11% 6.97 MB/s	4K Read 4.38 4K Write 2.84 4K Mixed 1.84 175% 3.02 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB 5,345 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	45.9% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 13.2 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 14.8 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	322x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	138x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	51x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	55x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	24x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	22x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 81%, 93,353 samples	16x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $794

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16