Asus F2A85-V PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus F2A85-V PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '18 at 08:54
Run Duration	316 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 84.3 1-Core 70 2-Core 115 57% 89.8 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 209 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 60%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8354) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.17% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.48 fps	MRender 2.05 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.91 1% 1.61 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.17% Great: 1%
AMD Radeon HD 7660D 7,665 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8526) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.87% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 7.77 Parallax 7.12 0% 4.99 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 6.23 Splatting 7.83 5% 6.38 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.87% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 224GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4787 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2400 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 54 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 22 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1764 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7803336842	79.8% Very good	Read 505 Write 384 Mixed 409 96% 433 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 20.3 117% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 35.6 DQ Write 54.6 DQ Mixed 59.1 41% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 122GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 89 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 41 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 54 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 461636758	79% Very good	Read 508 Write 384 Mixed 419 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 19.2 114% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 38.5 DQ Write 55.2 DQ Mixed 19.7 22% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 128%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 39GB free Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7362 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3435 (B1) Unknown 94 94 62 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 57 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 81 81 18656 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1388 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10101474464	52.3% Above average	Read 461 Write 126 Mixed 135 52% 241 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 8.49 86% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 21.3 DQ Write 60.7 DQ Mixed 25.3 24% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 73%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 931GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 132 132 4366 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1493 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1716 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1432 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1308 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1094 (C2) HDA temperature 116 110 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 196 12274 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	95.9% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 149 Mixed 153 122% 162 MB/s	4K Read 0.97 4K Write 2.59 4K Mixed 0.3 122% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 87%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 145 142 3733 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10783 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 16952 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 9203 (C0) Power-off retract count 195 195 3964 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 151 151 149390 (C2) HDA temperature 115 99 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	33.5% Below average	Read 63.9 Write 53.1 Mixed 57.7 44% 58.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.05 4K Write 0.51 4K Mixed 0.05 17% 0.21 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 54%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 40GB free Firmware: 0102 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 56.9 Write 57.4 Mixed 54.3 42% 56.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.47 111% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB 5,448 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.3% Below average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 11.1 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.4 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A85-V PRO Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-V PRO - $165

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	25x
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples	18x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon HD 8670DAMDBench 5%, 5,822 samples	10x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x

SSD
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	9x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CF8 Corsair CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 M378B5673FH0-CF8 M378B5673FH0-CF8 12GBSamsungBench 29%, 18 samples	8x
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 43%, 130 samples	5x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $284

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16