Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150805
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '18 at 22:08
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	61.7% Good	Memory 79 1-Core 69.1 2-Core 132 57% 93.2 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 422 40% 332 Pts	64-Core 422 26% 422 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gainward(10B0 1B81) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.2% Below average	Lighting 39.9 Reflection 46.2 Parallax 34 32% 40 fps	MRender 58.7 Gravity 39 Splatting 50.3 40% 49.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 105GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 966 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 516 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 58 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 42 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2936091013	50% Above average	Read 354 Write 209 Mixed 212 57% 258 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 29.1 4K Mixed 12.4 74% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 29.2 DQ Write 45.7 DQ Mixed 10.4 16% 28.4 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 123%
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40 2,820 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.0.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 110 28727632 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 29523605197365 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2480 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 258 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 34 51 55837917218 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 28727632 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 28727632 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 28727632 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10867 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11272 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11272 (F2) Unknown 0 0 14487	39.4% Below average	Read 156 Write 165 Mixed 140 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 10.2 71% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 30.1 DQ Write 88.1 DQ Mixed 9.27 21% 42.5 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 80%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$20 12,691 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 177GB free Firmware: 0002SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 173440196 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3878 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 328791753 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9188 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 37 3888 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BC) Unknown 100 93 4295032856 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 56 471203866 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 80 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 41 41 119610 (C2) HDA temperature 26 44 47244640282 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 55 40 173440196 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 15 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	33.7% Below average	Read 51.2 Write 66.4 Mixed 21.8 34% 46.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.23 57% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB 5,448 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.3% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 16.1 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 12.4 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 82.5 48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	127x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	73x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	24x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16