Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 12 '18 at 18:17
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 240
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 685
67% 551 Pts
64-Core 688
43% 688 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 197
Parallax 189
142% 187 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 167
Splatting 120
112% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300. 960GB
644GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 495
Write 260
Mixed 270
75% 342 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 4.61
75% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 23.7
76% 171 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 103%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2,044
Write 1,143
Mixed 1,161
319% 1,450 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 46.1
196% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 469
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 150
166% 286 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 227%
Great: 236%
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
98GB free
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 421
Mixed 409
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 35.2
153% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 123
146% 253 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 109
Write 119
Mixed 71.7
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 4.31
4K Mixed 0.55
179% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 70%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 158
Mixed 148
118% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.78
4K Mixed 0.23
104% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 112%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
6GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
8.91% Terrible
Read 26.5
Write 5.98
Mixed 9.73
14% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.23
4K Write 0.67
4K Mixed 0.41
63% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.91%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
MC Read 34
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 30.5
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 25.2
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $960
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback