HP Compaq dc5750 Small Form Factor

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 28%
Workstation 18%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemHP Compaq dc5750 Small Form Factor  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A64h
Memory4.1 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111004
Uptime14.1 Days
Run DateJun 12 '18 at 15:17
Run Duration488 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
23.7% Poor
SC Int 60
SC Float 43.4
SC Mixed 50.4
41% 51.3 Pts
QC Int 115
QC Float 81.4
QC Mixed 94.7
22% 97.1 Pts
MC Int 120
MC Float 84.9
MC Mixed 99.1
15% 101 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6350
HP(103C 2126) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 5
1% 4.6 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3.9
1% 3.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$28
179GB free
Firmware: 1AA01117 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 70.3
Write 87.9
Mixed 55
53% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.41
102% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$37
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 53.8
Write 45
Mixed 14.8
28% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.23
64% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 43%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 32GB-$24
7GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.94% Terrible
Read 25.6
Write 18.5
Mixed 20.2
26% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.57
4K Write 0.44
4K Mixed 0.05
30% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.94%
Great: 51%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 4GB
2GB free, PID c03a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.81% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 2.65
Mixed 4.81
8% 8 MB/s
4K Read 3.49
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.004
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.81%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 41GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
23.2% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 22%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Compaq dc5750 Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 29%
Workstation 19%

System: HP Compaq dc5750 Small Form Factor

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $339AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $145SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $155SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback