Asus H61M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-K (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140721
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '18 at 19:01
Run Duration	353 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 94 1-Core 105 2-Core 207 79% 135 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 397 52% 390 Pts	64-Core 398 25% 398 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 2740) 2GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	29% Poor	Lighting 36.6 Reflection 33.2 Parallax 44.9 30% 38.2 fps	MRender 28.8 Gravity 31.1 Splatting 38 27% 32.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4621 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 309 (B1) Unknown 98 98 23 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 52 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 278 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12610007112	58.9% Above average	Read 382 Write 309 Mixed 312 74% 334 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 18 76% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 31.2 DQ Write 43.5 DQ Mixed 114 65% 62.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 124%
SanDisk X100 128GB 1,695 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 49GB free Firmware: 10.06.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 253 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 8369 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2056 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1060 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 99 2 65159 (BE) vendor-specific 71 29 29 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	57.7% Above average	Read 314 Write 277 Mixed 290 66% 294 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 12.9 65% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 11.3 60% 138 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 91%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$80 10,362 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 163GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 174 6233 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12614 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 25802 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2133 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1305 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 12623 (C2) HDA temperature 119 88 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.8% Average	Read 75.8 Write 72.8 Mixed 74.2 56% 74.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.42 112% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 51%
Toshiba MG03ACA100 1TB 1,552 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 85GB free Firmware: FL1A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 1 4477 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 14282 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 17 17 33392 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3262 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 1052 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 16401 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 197569413148 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 1 1 944117 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 105 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	50.9% Above average	Read 76.1 Write 101 Mixed 78.8 64% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 2.65 4K Mixed 0.48 127% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 91%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 13GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	7.41% Terrible	Read 21.2 Write 4.41 Mixed 6.45 10% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.71 4K Write 0.81 4K Mixed 0.93 73% 1.81 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.41% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 16,567 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	61.9% Good	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 19.5 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 19.4 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 59.8 67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	331x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	265x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	188x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	441x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	144x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	112x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	65x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	49x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	49x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	48x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16