Asus PRIME X370-A

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-A (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171204
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '18 at 15:59
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 80 1-Core 111 2-Core 221 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 734 72% 587 Pts	64-Core 914 56% 914 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Lighting 77.1 Reflection 77.2 Parallax 67 63% 73.8 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 70.1 Splatting 70.8 58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8416 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1844 (B1) Unknown 95 95 98 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 54 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 103 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23047557034	103% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 406 Mixed 417 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 73.5 4K Mixed 39.9 153% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 101 111% 188 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 115%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB 16,094 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 648GB free Firmware: SC12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 227984248 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 941 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 64 60 2950732 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2367 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 632 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 63 63 37 (BE) vendor-specific 64 57 723058724 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 89 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 942 (C2) HDA temperature 36 43 81604378660 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	52.2% Above average	Read 96.2 Write 85.8 Mixed 80.2 66% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.12 65% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 100%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 83GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 178 6000 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2387 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 9100 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1719 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 159 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6912 (C2) HDA temperature 111 100 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	77.3% Very good	Read 152 Write 118 Mixed 125 99% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.17 84% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 88%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 63GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 77 77 7630 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 5695 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 9950 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 35243 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5069 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 54 705888298 (C2) HDA temperature 62 51 739442726 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1296348 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 4 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	36.3% Below average	Read 65.4 Write 61 Mixed 93.4 56% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.3 87% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 44.4 MC Write 39.6 MC Mixed 35.5 114% 39.8 GB/s	SC Read 24.5 SC Write 42 SC Mixed 29.5 91% 32 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-A Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-A

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	57x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	48x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	44x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	34x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	34x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	21x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	13x
HyperX 2666 C16 2x16GBKingstonBench 84%, 17,710 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $677

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16