Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	42 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170831
Uptime	5.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '18 at 02:09
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 56.6 1-Core 104 2-Core 208 66% 123 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 834 74% 625 Pts	64-Core 2276 141% 2276 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 162 Parallax 168 108% 154 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 157 Splatting 103 98% 122 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial_CT2050MX300SSD1 2TB 2,359 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 213 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 644 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 55 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 71 66 146030067741 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 92663177 (F7) Unknown 100 100 2908038 (F8) Unknown 100 100 3839011 (B4) Unknown 0 0 9107 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	55.2% Above average	Read 383 Write 294 Mixed 283 71% 320 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 9.98 58% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 96 DQ Mixed 8.19 34% 76.8 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 99%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 707GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	173% Outstanding	Read 1,516 Write 1,245 Mixed 1,041 282% 1,268 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 50.8 4K Mixed 28.4 113% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 43.8 DQ Mixed 14.9 17% 29 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 173% Great: 302%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 689GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	179% Outstanding	Read 1,466 Write 1,225 Mixed 1,072 279% 1,255 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 30.3 122% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 151 DQ Mixed 79.7 87% 147 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 302%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 6.5TB free Firmware: RT17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 99 57890792 (03) Spinup time 92 89 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 886 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 4300356656 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1106 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 677 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 59 504758302 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2761 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4529 (C2) HDA temperature 30 41 77309411358 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 113 99 57890792 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -64317135256714 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3720389635 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2792951242	57.6% Above average	Read 106 Write 93.3 Mixed 68 66% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 6.61 4K Mixed 0.5 206% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 87%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4TB free Firmware: FS2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 10283 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 706 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1175 (0A) Spinup retry count 114 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 641 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 5 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 25 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1387 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 184684576800 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 98 98 962 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 556 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0
Poor: 58% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139 14,506 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 44.5 MC Write 45.5 MC Mixed 42.7 126% 44.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 27.3 SC Mixed 19.1 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	144x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	42x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	49x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	10x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	10x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 86%, 3,127 samples	7x
CMU64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GBCorsairBench 97%, 731 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $981

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16