Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 09 '18 at 00:38
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 133
2-Core 265
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 818
83% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,041
64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2540 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 142
Reflection 158
Parallax 134
116% 145 fps
Gravity 136
Splatting 113
109% 124 fps
Poor: 93% Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
319GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 495
Write 467
Mixed 462
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 17.2
99% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 15.8
56% 119 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 107%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,900
Write 1,327
Mixed 1,188
326% 1,472 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 25
146% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 41.3
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 20.4
42% 80.2 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 205%
Great: 254%
Hitachi HDS5C3015ALA632 1.5TB
730GB free
Firmware: ML5OA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 71
Write 76.7
Mixed 62.1
52% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.28
76% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 66%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
1TB free, PID 3312
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 161
Write 158
Mixed 151
201% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.22
49% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSA.8FADG 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 44
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 22.5
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 108%
This bench: 114%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $906
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback