User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHewlett-Packard
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 805A
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '18 at 00:14
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6 PRO-7400B R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4G
XU1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
42% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 104
49% 79 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 104
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 805A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 5.88
Parallax 6.28
3% 5.46 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 4.87
4% 4.14 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
826GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 150
Write 135
Mixed 118
100% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.18
79% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 107%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
145GB free
Firmware: 1AC0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 62.3
Write 98.5
Mixed 73.6
59% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.41
107% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix V-GeN D3H2GL1333X8 HMT451U6AFR8C-RD 6GB
1333, 1866 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback