Gigabyte Z370P D3

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370P D3
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370P D3 (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '18 at 18:44
Run Duration	103 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Memory 94.8 1-Core 127 2-Core 254 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 501 8-Core 741 77% 621 Pts	64-Core 742 46% 742 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 34EF) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.29% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.51 fps	MRender 3.52 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 2 2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.29% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 10 (A5) Unknown 100 100 22 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3 (A9) Unknown 100 100 49 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 68 37 158914773024 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 25771114502 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 47 (EA) Unknown 100 100 123 (F1) Unknown 100 100 55 (F2) Unknown 100 100 28 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	39.5% Below average	Read 510 Write 73.4 Mixed 116 50% 233 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 25.9 4K Mixed 5.15 48% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 20.2 DQ Write 31.7 DQ Mixed 3.34 9% 18.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	45.6% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 11.8 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 13.2 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 57.6 69% 57.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370P D3-CF Builds (Compare 7,244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 48%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370P D3 - $190

CPU
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	1,303x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	1,301x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,265x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	754x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	520x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	507x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	237x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	227x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	182x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	341x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	215x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	142x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $602

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16