Toshiba Qosmio X505

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba Qosmio X505 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Qosmio X505
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101210
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '18 at 13:48
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 67.6 2-Core 117 59% 92.1 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 213 25% 193 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250M 297 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FF50) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	3.72% Terrible	Lighting 4.93 Reflection 5.81 Parallax 2.06 4% 4.27 fps	MRender 5.57 Gravity 3.47 Splatting 2.96 3% 4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.72% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199 10,165 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 94 21862150 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 3 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 51960514367590 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3958 (AB) Unknown 0 0 3 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 33 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 3 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 21862150 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 3 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 21862150 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 21862150 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15900 (EA) Unknown 0 0 12822 (F1) Unknown 0 0 12822 (F2) Unknown 0 0 17388	29.7% Poor	Read 193 Write 147 Mixed 129 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 9.42 4K Write 20.1 4K Mixed 3.86 30% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 90.1 DQ Mixed 3.6 30% 69.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 66%
Hitachi HTS545032A7E380 320GB 4,858 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 280GB free Firmware: GGBOA7A0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 214 214 60129542145 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 8344 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 4636 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 4415 (BF) G-sense error rate 96 96 196613 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 15 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 19946 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 197569216548 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	33.8% Below average	Read 61.5 Write 56 Mixed 62.2 45% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.17 58% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT125S6TFR8C-H9 80CE M471B5673EH1-CF8 4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 667, 533 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.7% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 10.1 34% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 36%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio X505 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X505

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	20x
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	14x
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce GTS 360MNvidiaBench 4%, 1,262 samples	35x
GeForce GTX 460MNvidiaBench 6%, 3,887 samples	18x
GeForce GTS 250MNvidiaBench 4%, 297 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	2x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	7x
M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 2,358 samples	5x
M471B5273CH0-CF8 80CE M471B5673FH0-CF8 6GBUnknownBench 26%, 41 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $218

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16