Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '18 at 16:28
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel @ 2.40GHz 172 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 174 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 650 58% 488 Pts	64-Core 1,290 80% 1,290 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4995) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	61.9% Good	Lighting 69.2 Reflection 91.7 Parallax 110 56% 90.2 fps	MRender 92.5 Gravity 97 Splatting 79.8 72% 89.8 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 19,151 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 60GB free Firmware: 57DA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	173% Outstanding	Read 1,852 Write 939 Mixed 1,259 298% 1,350 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 56.2 4K Mixed 36.2 107% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 85.7 89% 149 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 173% Great: 207%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 36GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6972 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2359 (B1) Unknown 86 86 163 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 49 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 7 (EB) Unknown 99 99 485 (F1) Unknown 99 99 43926289455	70.9% Very good	Read 501 Write 338 Mixed 353 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 21.1 4K Mixed 18.6 69% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 65.7 86% 158 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5089 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1756 (B1) Unknown 97 97 55 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 42 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 132 (F1) Unknown 99 99 22944745537	80.5% Excellent	Read 509 Write 408 Mixed 419 99% 445 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 27.5 4K Mixed 28 84% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 86.2 93% 157 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 124%
OCZ Vertex 460A 240GB-$177 1,086 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 5GB free Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3233 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2385 (AB) Unknown 100 100 81935184 (AE) Unknown 100 100 377 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 98 (D2) Unknown 100 100 1 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 97 97 97 (F1) Unknown 100 100 7938 (F2) Unknown 100 100 6633 (F9) Unknown 100 100 333418318	86.9% Excellent	Read 504 Write 489 Mixed 493 111% 495 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 20.4 90% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 59.1 91% 169 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 9905622-057.A00G 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	61.7% Good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 20.5 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 14.3 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	466x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	109x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	85x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	75x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	46x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	42x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	21x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x4GBCorsair $97Bench 83%, 3,926 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	9x
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $982

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16