ECT ONE GameStar PC Titan X

Performance Results


Gaming 132% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 123% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	ECT ONE GameStar PC Titan X (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING
Memory	25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180427
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '18 at 17:08
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$198 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 89.7 1-Core 156 2-Core 308 100% 185 Pts	4-Core 618 8-Core 989 99% 804 Pts	64-Core 1,226 76% 1,226 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Lighting 178 Reflection 204 Parallax 199 145% 194 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 181 Splatting 129 119% 147 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	257% Outstanding	Read 2,719 Write 1,038 Mixed 1,294 368% 1,684 MB/s	4K Read 55.8 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 48.5 209% 73.8 MB/s	DQ Read 583 DQ Write 412 DQ Mixed 209 234% 401 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 257% Great: 236%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7117 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 108 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 314 (0A) Spinup retry count 102 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 81 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 13 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 14 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 117 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 197569544230 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 307 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 560 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	70.9% Very good	Read 119 Write 128 Mixed 124 93% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.43 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.32 131% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD CT16G4DFD824A.C16FHD 32GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77.9% Very good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 24.1 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 30.7 SC Mixed 25.5 70% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ONE GameStar PC Titan X Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 113%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 103%

UFO

System: ECT ONE GameStar PC Titan X

CPU
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples	5x
Core i7-8700KIntel $198Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	5x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	1x

SSD
Blue 3D 500GBWD $67Bench 97%, 43,442 samples	2x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	1x
Blue 3D 1TBWD $85Bench 100%, 16,039 samples	1x

RAM
CT16G4DFD824A.M16FD CT16G4DFD824A.M16FB CT16G4DFD824A.C16FJ CT16G4DFD824A.M16FB 64GBCrucialBench 80%, 2 samples	2x
CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD 2x16GBCrucialBench 77%, 563 samples	1x
CT16G4DFD824A.C16FHD 2x16GBCrucialBench 75%, 517 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $965

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16