| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-DGS (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180103 |
| Uptime | 3.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 04 '18 at 18:37 |
| Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.5%
Good
|
66% 117 Pts
|
55% 452 Pts
|
45% 721 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.5.2
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
18% 25.2 fps
|
20% 23.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
61.1%
Good
|
64% 293 MB/s
|
84% 32.8 MB/s
|
64% 112 MB/s
|
|
|
73.8%
Very good
|
94% 125 MB/s
|
133% 1.25 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
236GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
17.3%
Very poor
|
38% 30.4 MB/s
|
58% 0.64 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FD2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
41%
Average
|
41% 14.5 GB/s
|
33% 11.4 GB/s
|
38% 104 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 450 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 67x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 64x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 49x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 80x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 34x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 20x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $187 |