Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 03 '18 at 22:42
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 141
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 485
45% 377 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E289) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1090 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 75.7
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 86.9
62% 75.1 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 61.8
Splatting 79.8
56% 67.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 484
Write 382
Mixed 402
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 18.1
100% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31
DQ Write 43.8
DQ Mixed 80.3
49% 51.7 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 134%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 171
Mixed 174
135% 180 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.14
56% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
343GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 117
Write 110
Mixed 115
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.12
46% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.2% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 18.5
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 14.3
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback