Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '18 at 10:02
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 83.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 258
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 993
90% 754 Pts
64-Core 1,389
86% 1,389 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Lighting 65.9
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 57.7
54% 63.3 fps
MRender 69.1
Gravity 63
Splatting 66.8
54% 66.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 529
Write 420
Mixed 431
102% 460 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 40.9
165% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 105
111% 184 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%
Innostor Innostor 64GB
58GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 118
Write 9.2
Mixed 8.04
35% 45 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0.001
4K Mixed 0.01
27% 2.44 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 30%
SanDisk U3 Titanium 8GB
7GB free, PID 5408
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 33
Write 17
Mixed 19
26% 23 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
36% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 32.1
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 28.3
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback