Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 51.3 2-Core 148 57% 95.1 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 290 35% 271 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	13.9% Very poor	Lighting 8.27 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 13.9 7% 13 fps	MRender 33.5 Gravity 35.8 Splatting 32.9 28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 1.5TB 691GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Virtual Disk 56GB 384 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	38.4% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 13 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 8.3 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 26,466 samples	12x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $421

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16