Asus B85M-G

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-G (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130731
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 01 '18 at 04:58
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$52 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 103 2-Core 202 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 286 39% 290 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.4% Above average	Lighting 70.1 Reflection 71.9 Parallax 63.2 57% 68.4 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 67.5 Splatting 65 55% 67.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13143 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1056 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 95 95 176 (AE) Unknown 100 100 17 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2590 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 46 231928823850 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 95 95 5 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 22294775200 (F7) Unknown 100 100 697901165 (F8) Unknown 100 100 983557841	96.9% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 385 Mixed 315 89% 404 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 91.2 4K Mixed 32.5 138% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 64.8 99% 189 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 920GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 3901 (03) Spinup time 175 172 2208 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2504 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7340 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1336 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 90 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2413 (C2) HDA temperature 105 97 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 3 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 3 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 3	99.3% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 175 Mixed 120 116% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1.25 4K Write 3.07 4K Mixed 0.34 147% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 109%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 917GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 171 169 6433 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 399 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1632 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 92 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1051 (C2) HDA temperature 114 110 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	76.3% Very good	Read 136 Write 130 Mixed 84.8 87% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.24 100% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 101%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 213GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 160 158 4966 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11190 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 4 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 51 51 36493 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4892 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 560 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11182 (C2) HDA temperature 104 86 43 (C4) Reallocation count 196 196 4 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 111 0	61.1% Good	Read 110 Write 102 Mixed 78.6 72% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 0.38 114% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 62%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 206GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 168 2216 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6456 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18311 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3243 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 45 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6410 (C2) HDA temperature 107 101 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	77.4% Very good	Read 139 Write 131 Mixed 84.5 88% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.2 57% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5173CB0-CK0 1201 AV34G1339U2 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.1% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11.6 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 10.6 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	958x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	785x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	532x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	480x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	401x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	368x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	259x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	163x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	153x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	156x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	126x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $317

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16