Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	May 31 '18 at 20:51
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 74.1 1-Core 118 2-Core 235 78% 143 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 922 83% 697 Pts	64-Core 1,295 80% 1,295 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2890 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 397.93 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.5% Very poor	Lighting 19.8 Reflection 22.9 Parallax 18.6 16% 20.4 fps	MRender 28.1 Gravity 19.8 Splatting 25.9 20% 24.6 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon L8H-128V2G-HP 128GB 1,392 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2803 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 494 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1567 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 47 (AE) Unknown 100 100 73 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 4 (F1) Unknown 100 100 123574 (F2) Unknown 100 100 189192	57% Above average	Read 506 Write 140 Mixed 219 63% 288 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 14.8 84% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 21.3 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 15.8 31% 57.7 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 81%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 34GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1257 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 86 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 54 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 23 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3480753586	93.1% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 413 Mixed 429 101% 452 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 33.7 116% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 104 120% 206 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 129%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB 71,657 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free Firmware: SBK2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 73 64 22199468 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1742 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 17249668452 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 -34484292415594 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 477 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 44 403832856 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 19 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 80 80 41478 (C2) HDA temperature 24 56 30064771096 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 76218489636013 (F1) Unknown 100 253 17968091697 (F2) Unknown 100 253 10139967886 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	62.2% Good	Read 105 Write 110 Mixed 66.1 70% 93.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.96 4K Write 5.15 4K Mixed 0.53 195% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 67%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 348GB free Firmware: PB4OC66G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 141 141 90194313218 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 6549 (05) Reallocated sector count 83 83 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 13309 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 4715 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 130 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 69 69 313286 (C2) HDA temperature 239 239 236223594519 (C4) Reallocation count 83 83 1227 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	44.9% Average	Read 77.1 Write 79.3 Mixed 74 58% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.34 82% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90 9,857 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	85% Excellent	MC Read 32.7 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 28.1 87% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 26.8 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 92.2 43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)