| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110322 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 31 '18 at 18:35 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.9%
Good
|
58% 90.8 Pts
|
31% 231 Pts
|
14% 231 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7970-$435
AMD(1002 3000) 3GB
CLim: 1180 MHz, MLim: 1700 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.5.2
|
43.6%
Average
|
47% 55.3 fps
|
38% 45.5 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
41.9%
Average
|
41% 14.4 GB/s
|
26% 9.27 GB/s
|
68% 58.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-MA770T-UD3 Builds (Compare 129 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 21x |
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 15x |
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
| GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples | 7x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $174 |