MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A32
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180427
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 31 '18 at 17:48
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 233
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 904
80% 676 Pts
64-Core 1,319
82% 1,319 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 160
Parallax 137
114% 145 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 143
Splatting 118
104% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
143GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 441
Write 169
Mixed 211
60% 274 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 7.42
71% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 87.4
DQ Mixed 34.6
58% 117 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 83%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 2,895
Write 1,146
Mixed 1,380
395% 1,807 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 39.9
196% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 113
126% 215 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 256%
Great: 236%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
40GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 511
Write 188
Mixed 253
69% 317 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 16.6
104% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 41.8
61% 111 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 84%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
862GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 117
Write 141
Mixed 131
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.83
4K Mixed 0.58
146% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 75%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
221GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 138
Write 110
Mixed 119
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.18
71% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
172GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 95.4
Write 128
Mixed 104
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 2.73
4K Mixed 0.33
107% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 34.9
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 27.6
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $918
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback