Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v6 526 User benchmarks, average bench 81% Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	69% Good	Memory 72.9 1-Core 59.6 2-Core 180 58% 104 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 682 61% 515 Pts	64-Core 690 43% 690 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 89%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4 10,188 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 388GB free (System drive) Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Read 673 Write 470 Mixed 502 122% 548 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 28 4K Mixed 22.4 83% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 130 125% 197 MB/s
Poor: 148% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 293%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 4TB 106 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 3TB free Firmware: 4.50 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HP 862690-091 2x16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	76.8% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 25.8 83% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 24.3 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 94.8 42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	2x

SSD
PX-512S2C 512GBPlextorBench 86%, 304 samples	1x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	1x

RAM
NOT AVAILABLE HP 862689-091 16GBUNKNOWNBench 68%, 4 samples	2x
NOT AVAILABLE 2x4GBUNKNOWNBench 45%, 58 samples	2x
NOT AVAILABLE 4x16GBUNKNOWNBench 62%, 75 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16