Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 91% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	93.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming K3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 30 '18 at 05:10
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Memory 95.8 1-Core 159 2-Core 318 104% 191 Pts	4-Core 636 8-Core 951 99% 794 Pts	64-Core 954 59% 954 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 125 Parallax 106 97% 116 fps	MRender 101 Gravity 108 Splatting 108 87% 106 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KINGSTON 120GB 834 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 0 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 424 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 150 (94) Unknown 100 100 0 (95) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 6 (AA) Unknown 100 100 7 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 786459 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 27 (C2) HDA temperature 67 61 167505100833 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 2 2 98 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1049 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1024 (F2) Unknown 100 100 804 (F4) Unknown 100 100 12 (F5) Unknown 100 100 27 (F6) Unknown 100 100 74988	68.7% Good	Read 464 Write 361 Mixed 192 75% 339 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 93.3 4K Mixed 5.88 92% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 13.1 DQ Mixed 8.46 20% 43.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$40 57,200 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 152GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 189 185 1541 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2290 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6696 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1287 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 5940 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 106 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 185 185 45893 (C2) HDA temperature 119 99 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 196 35 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (F0) Head flying hours 95 95 3757 (F1) Unknown 200 200 9539923959 (F2) Unknown 200 200 10805536739 (FE) Unknown 198 198 2	44.4% Average	Read 72 Write 82.6 Mixed 75 58% 76.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.21 75% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 63%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 139GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 123 114 6850 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7301 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10221 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3285 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 251 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 172 172 84746 (C2) HDA temperature 112 98 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.9% Average	Read 75.1 Write 74.1 Mixed 69.7 55% 73 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.18 66% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 59%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 156GB free Firmware: 1AJ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 17 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 83 82 5379 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4802 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10584 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 29 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3437 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 6 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 57 188979675170 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 50 1 26780 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 58 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 29 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 5061	60.5% Good	Read 105 Write 105 Mixed 110 81% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.33 107% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 77%
BUFFALO External HDD 1TB 583 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 238GB free, PID 0105 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Read 37.1 Write 38.2 Mixed 37.3 49% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 2.47 4K Mixed 0.39 99% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90 9,857 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 37.5 MC Write 39.5 MC Mixed 31.7 104% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 42 SC Mixed 31 91% 31.7 GB/s	Latency 54.7 73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF Builds (Compare 1,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	402x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	288x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	163x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	137x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	126x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	114x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	40x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	35x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	62x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	29x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $672

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16