Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics66.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4/3.1  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '16 at 19:06
Run Duration518 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2675 v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 126
57% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 477
42% 360 Pts
64-Core 1,258
78% 1,258 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6451
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.6% Good
Lighting 84.3
Reflection 88.6
Parallax 86.7
69% 86.5 fps
MRender 83.2
Gravity 76.8
Splatting 71.1
62% 77 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 510
Write 407
Mixed 412
99% 443 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 19.3
109% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 36.2
DQ Write 56.2
DQ Mixed 19.3
22% 37.2 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
895GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 154
Mixed 152
128% 170 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.25
81% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
SanDisk Cruzer Slice 16GB
3GB free, PID 5566
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 19.6
Write 5.24
Mixed 8.04
11% 11 MB/s
4K Read 3.93
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 1.22
126% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 13%
TOSHIBA USB DRV 8GB
1GB free, PID 1400
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.78% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 3.31
Mixed 5.17
8% 7.74 MB/s
4K Read 3.84
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.004
14% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.78%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 56.5
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 39.4
123% 43 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 14.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4/3.1 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $439
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback