User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade
MotherboardINTEL SKYBAY
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160407
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMay 29 '18 at 06:19
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 150
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 517
49% 408 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Device(1A58 674E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.62% Terrible
Lighting 5.87
Reflection 41
Parallax 5.81
5% 17.5 fps
MRender 8.19
Gravity 5.33
Splatting 11.9
7% 8.46 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.62%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7000Q
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 1,378
Write 293
Mixed 466
154% 713 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 18.3
124% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 35.1
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 110
93% 129 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 115%
Great: 144%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.9% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 18.6
62% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback