Asus P7P55D-E PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E PRO (all builds)
Memory	6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120626
Uptime	20 Days
Run Date	May 29 '18 at 05:51
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	65% Good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 73.3 2-Core 126 62% 97.8 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 313 31% 255 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Sapphire(174B E308) CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.4.1 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Lighting 43.9 Reflection 51.3 Parallax 59.6 36% 51.6 fps	MRender 50.7 Gravity 39.3 Splatting 36.9 34% 42.3 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130 4,476 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3415 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2549 (B1) Unknown 100 100 779852 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 55 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 7 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 732451 (F2) Unknown 100 100 900158	56.2% Above average	Read 358 Write 168 Mixed 224 55% 250 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 17.4 88% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 57.8 61% 101 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 98%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 138 138 34386870687 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6044 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10366 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1639 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6048 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6048 (C2) HDA temperature 142 142 214749151274 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	87.4% Excellent	Read 158 Write 146 Mixed 143 112% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.23 94% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 107%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 505GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 10 (03) Spinup time 176 173 4175 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9052 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29916 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5417 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 141 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8910 (C2) HDA temperature 103 95 44 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	41.6% Average	Read 73.8 Write 70.9 Mixed 91.9 60% 78.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.38 96% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 76%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB 947 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 365GB free, PID a003 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 78.7 Write 79.2 Mixed 63.9 94% 74 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.43 4K Mixed 0.3 26% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 12.4 36% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 10.6 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 59.5 67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E PRO Builds (Compare 345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E PRO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	79x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	76x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	134x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	121x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $426

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16