Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus PRIME Z270-A (all builds)
Memory	14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 28 '18 at 20:46
Run Duration	342 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 97.1 1-Core 160 2-Core 318 105% 192 Pts	4-Core 614 8-Core 885 94% 750 Pts	64-Core 884 55% 884 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% MSI(1462 2825) 2GB CLim: 1301 MHz, MLim: 1882 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.93 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Lighting 44.3 Reflection 41.4 Parallax 59 36% 48.2 fps	MRender 58 Gravity 51.1 Splatting 38.3 39% 49.1 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 1 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 17997 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4065 (B1) Unknown 53 53 564 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 1 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 58 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2364 (F1) Unknown 99 99 167323543999	86.9% Excellent	Read 485 Write 342 Mixed 334 86% 387 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 64.6 4K Mixed 21.5 112% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 70.1 116% 227 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 434GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 171 2283 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5953 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 18169 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3952 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 952 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5002 (C2) HDA temperature 112 107 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	90.4% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 159 Mixed 152 117% 156 MB/s	4K Read 1.31 4K Write 2.45 4K Mixed 0.37 141% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 109%
ADATA SH14 1TB 270 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 115GB free, PID a14a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 95.1 Write 91.7 Mixed 71.9 109% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.2 66% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 42%
Adata DashDrive Elite UE700 USB 3.0 64GB-$33 375 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 35GB free, PID de7a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 203 Write 39.5 Mixed 7.57 70% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.43 4K Write 0.14 4K Mixed 0.007 29% 2.19 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 50%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB 664 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 1607 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	6.14% Terrible	Read 20.2 Write 6.08 Mixed 5.19 10% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.69 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 30% 2.58 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.14% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 1x16GB 4,112 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3467 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.8% Good	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 17.2 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 24.6 SC Mixed 21.3 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 49.8 80% 49.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	3,691x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	1,437x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	612x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1,144x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	864x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	810x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	372x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	340x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	241x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	762x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	323x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	159x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $685

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16