Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K3

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K3 (all builds)
Memory	17.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	May 28 '18 at 17:46
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Memory 80.2 1-Core 118 2-Core 227 79% 142 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 632 68% 541 Pts	64-Core 632 39% 632 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 862D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.93 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59% Above average	Lighting 74 Reflection 73.3 Parallax 63.9 60% 70.4 fps	MRender 69.1 Gravity 68.1 Splatting 69.2 56% 68.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149 16,872 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 221GB free Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -43241730725154 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1061 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 34 (B7) Unknown 100 100 13 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 31 44 64427393055 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 34 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 134155 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 54 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 97 97 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 134155 (F2) Unknown 100 100 160478 (F9) Unknown 100 100 41604	55.9% Above average	Read 120 Write 303 Mixed 326 57% 250 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 21.4 103% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 23.8 DQ Write 66.2 DQ Mixed 12.7 19% 34.3 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 91%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135 28,136 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Read 1,330 Write 225 Mixed 419 142% 658 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 57.1 4K Mixed 11.3 95% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 36.8 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 39.6 50% 83.7 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 144%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 104GB free Firmware: SBFK10D7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 356 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 173 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 8 (AA) Unknown 100 100 16 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 327692 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 13 (C2) HDA temperature 72 58 180388626460 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1256 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1401 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1420 (F4) Unknown 100 100 5 (F5) Unknown 100 100 12 (F6) Unknown 100 100 249504	53.1% Above average	Read 274 Write 275 Mixed 320 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 7.79 84% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 31.8 DQ Write 54.1 DQ Mixed 8.14 16% 31.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown R748G2400U2S Samsung M378A5244BB0-CRC R748G2400U2S CT4G4DFS824A.C8FHP 24GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.9% Excellent	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 28 81% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 37.6 SC Mixed 26.3 83% 29.2 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K3 Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K3

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	36x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	34x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	24x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	19x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	18x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	5x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16